Well , i are aware that online within the FIFA 15 Coins community there have been a lot of discussion about precisely how IF’s don’t play as well as NIF’s, people hating on MOTM/SIF/TIF cards saying that they played dreadful. Youtubers such as KSI came out and said IF’s are merely money grabs by EA those of you that would just like pretty teams. If you go on FUTHEAD and search hard enough, you will find a lot of examples of players with higher card-stat rating then another having lower IG stats(as an example, consider IF Quaresma Vs IF Salvio).
Also i noticed a lot of posts revolve around “should i buy player X over his NIF, could it be worth the money?”, accompanied by a topic brimming with opinion pieces which can or is probably not completely biased, or from players whose ability(or lack thereof) severely comprises the incredible to create a rational argument to or. I’m lots hot for the present day trend employing analytics in modern sports; “Moneyball” was one of my favourite books years prior to the movie, and I’ve always felt until recently football lacked the type of in-depth statistical feedback that other sports have(glance at the great number of team and individual stat criteria in baseball, A. football or hockey for example).
A few things i decided to try out was I chose several test players so as to devise a system to evaluate a player’s cost in direct comparison towards stats they bring to the table, in order to offer a statistical strategy for comparing players,lacking any opinion or preference bias. I made a decision to consult this as FIFA 15 Coins Per Stat(CPS for so few). To put it briefly, it’s a simple calculation utilizing a players total IG stats and max cap.
I chose the subsequent players running for example: Sanchez MOTM: 500K/ 2220 IGS= 225.23 SPC SIF:420K/ 2179 IGS= 192.75 SPC IF: 1110K/ 2114 IGS= 520 SPC NIF: 37.5K/ 2049 IGS= 18.3 SPC
Quaresma MOTM: 175K/ 2041 IGS= 85.74 SPC IF: 95K/ 1973 IGS= 48.1 SPC NIF: 5K/ 1902 IGS= 2.62 SPC Di Maria TOTY: 4000K/ 2369 IGS= 1688.48 SPC IF: 2900K/ 2199 IGS= 1318.78 SPC NIF: 47.5K/ 2153 IGS= 22.06 SPC Danilo SIF: 180K/ 2284 IGS= 78.81 SPC IF: 120K/ 2227 IGS= 53.88 SPC NIF: 7K/ 2162 IGS= 3.2 SPC Messi: TOTY: 5400K/ 2341 IGS= 2306.71 SPC SIF: 3800K/ 2244 IGS= 1693.4 SPC RB: 4000K/ 2214 IGS= 1806.68 SPC IF: 5800K/ 2167 IGS= 2676.51 SPC NIF: 2300K/ 2111 IGS= 1089.53 SPC
As you can tell, I have charted all the various variations of a player. For apparent reasons the NIF of the card may have the lowest value, but I used to be unsurprised to discover which the statistical improvement of IFs was overshadowed by their ballooning costs. Also, for example you can see that for Messi’s price you happen to be basically paying limited of coins to be able to have “Messi” although technically NIF ADM is a more well balanced player. Also unsurprisingly is the fact that players like Danilo are extremely cost-efficient because that his card has high rated stats in every single category, whereas a Messi is brought down heavily by his low defensive stats, stamina and strength.
How this is taken up a higher level? I’m sure this may be an extremely powerful tool for users on a tight budget; it provides a target technique of comparing different tiers of IF’s and determining the best longterm option for ones budget/needs. While I recognize, as an example, that this cannot be used independently possesses limitations caused by a number of the players lacking appropriate cap ratings, I think maybe it’s an excellent tool when you compare either 2 different players or two different versions of any card, in order to make a conscious, statistical decision within facts but not opinion. I’d personally adore to see FUTHEAD have something like this to ensure that players would not need to do the maths themselves.